Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is associated with significant healthcare and financial burden, as well as quality of life consequences. Patients and primary healthcare providers are often unsatisfied with available pharmacologic remedies and may seek complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies, which may be beneficial for abdominal pain and overall response in IBS (1,2). There is a continued need for novel evidence-based practices for the optimal management of IBS, regardless of whether treatments are CAM or traditional Western medicine.
In general, treatment is targeted at addressing a patient’s predominant symptoms, be that abdominal pain, diarrhoea, constipation or bloating (3). The main strategies for treatment for patients with IBS are dietary, psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy, and microbial therapies (4).
Management of IBS should include an integrated care model in which behavioural interventions, dietary modification, and medications are considered equal partners. This approach offers the greatest likelihood for success in the management of patients with IBS (5).
Good communication is paramount, and clinicians should provide a clear explanation about the disorder, with a focus on exploring the patient’s own beliefs about IBS and a discussion of any concerns they may have. It should be emphasised that symptoms are often chronic and that treatment, while aiming to improve symptoms, may not relieve them completely (3).
Initial management should include simple lifestyle and dietary advice (see below). Exercise, stress reduction, adequate daily fluid intake, and improved sleep can all help improve IBS symptoms (6). The concept of self-help is important in empowering patients to take control of managing their condition. Antispasmodics and peppermint oil can be used first-line for the treatment of abdominal pain. If patients fail to respond, central neuromodulators can be used second-line; tricyclic antidepressants are preferred (3).
If medical treatment is unsuccessful, patients should be referred for psychological therapy if they are amenable to this.
Pharmacotherapy
In addition to effective older medications that are inexpensive and reliable, there are also newer treatments for IBS-D such as eluxadoline, and IBS-C with linaclotide, lubiprostone, plecanatide, which also can provide lasting relief (7).
Diet
Dietary therapies for IBS are of particular interest because up to 90% of IBS patients exclude certain foods such as wheat products, milk and its products, cabbage, onion, hot spices, and fried and smoked foodstuffs (8,9) to improve their GI symptoms (9,10,11). However, in most cases, a positive response to food triggers are largely related to the meal-related nature of IBS rather than a true food allergy (3).
Dietary approaches to ease IBS symptoms have mixed results; however, diets empower patients and make them feel more in control, which may alleviate anxiety and improve symptoms in a non-specific way, which is probably why they are so popular with patients. Although dietary therapies are rapidly becoming the first-line treatment of IBS, clinicians need to be aware of the negative effects of prescribing restrictive diets and red flag symptoms of maladaptive eating patterns (12). In addition, the diets of IBS patients tend to be low in calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, vitamin B2, and vitamin A (8).
FODMAP
The fundamental basis for recommending a diet low in fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, and monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAPs) is that bloating results from bacterial fermentation of intraluminal saccharides.
Among the available dietary interventions for IBS, the low FODMAP diet has the greatest evidence, albeit controversial, for efficacy and may be useful for overall symptom improvement (13,14,15).
The low FODMAP diet is a 3 step diet used to help manage the symptoms of medically diagnosed IBS (16). Patient and practitioner FODMAP resources can be found here.
- The intake of a low FODMAP diet reportedly improves both symptoms and the quality of life in 50-76% of IBS patients (17).
- There is significant evidence from meta-analyses for the short-term benefits of a low FODMAP diet on GI symptoms and quality of life in patients with IBS (18,19). However, studies are generally of low quality due to methodological heterogeneity and a high risk of bias, which commonly occurs in studies of dietary treatments (20). Studies were also short duration studies (never >6 weeks), lacked definitions to substantiate claims of improvement, and lacked assessment of reintroduction of the FODMAPs during follow-up periods, leading researchers to conclude that the symptomatic effects reported in trials were likely to be driven primarily by a placebo response (4).
- Another meta-analysis found no statistically significant benefit of a low FODMAP diet compared with an alternative diet (13). Traditional dietary advice to eat small regular meals, avoid known trigger foods, and reduce alcohol and caffeine is as effective as a low FODMAP diet (21,22).
- Existing diet, colonic microbiota and their metabolic products may help predict who will respond to a low FODMAP diet (23).
- Current guidelines only weakly suggest a low FODMAP diet to treat IBS-C (13).
Concerns
A low FODMAP diet requires intensive meal-planning, is expensive and difficult to maintain over a long period, and can result in negative changes in the intestinal microbiota (22,24,25,26). Consuming a low FODMAP diet for a long time may result in deficiencies in vitamins, minerals, and naturally occurring antioxidants (24,26). Therefore, FODMAPs should be reintroduced to tolerance after a limited period of restriction, although randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to date have only examined the effect on symptoms during FODMAP elimination. Patients with IBS who choose to follow a low FODMAP diet should be aware of its 3 phases: restriction (4-8 weeks), reintroduction (6-10 weeks), and personalisation (ongoing) (5).
A selective approach rather than a comprehensive exclusion of all FODMAPs may be beneficial. The selective approach excludes (4):
- Fructans - these are not digested in the human gut and are therefore potential causes of bloating in all humans.
- Sugars (based on ethnicity) - for example, lactose, given that 65% of the human population has a reduced ability to digest lactose after infancy, albeit with wide regional and ethnic variations (27).
Modified NICE diet
The modified National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) diet has the same effect as a low FODMAP diet in around half (46-54%) of IBS patients, but it is easy to maintain and does not have the risks associated with a low-FODMAP diet (21,22). The modified NICE diet is the first diet recommended for IBS patients by the British Dietetic Association (BDA) (8,28,29,30,31). In the modified NICE diet, patients are advised to:
- Consume regular meals and moderate portion sizes. Do not skip meals.
- Drink plenty (up to 2 litres) of liquids a day, preferably water or caffeine-free drinks
- Replace wheat products with spelt products
- Reduce intake of fatty food, onions, cabbage, and beans
- Limit consumption of fresh fruit to no more than three daily portions of 80 g each
- Reduce consumption of “resistant starch” that is usually in pre-cooked or pre-packaged foods
- Avoid carbonated beverages and sweeteners whose names end with “-ol”. For example, sorbitol, an artificial sweetener found in chewing gums, sugar-free drinks and some products, especially for diabetic subjects.
- Moderate fibre intake, as it may be linked to the onset of symptoms. Reduce insoluble fibre (e.g., bran or bran-based cereals, wholemeal flour or derivatives) and increase soluble fibre, such as oat or psyllium husk fibres.
The BDA also recommends reducing the intake of coffee/tea (less than 3 cups per day), spicy foods, and alcohol (8,28). For IBS-D patients especially, it is important to control the consumption of fructose and sorbitol, alcohol and coffee (independently of caffeine content) (32).
Fibre
A systematic review and meta-analysis of 15 RCTs found a statistically significant effect in favour of dietary fibre compared with placebo in IBS (13). A subsequent review found fibre had no significant benefit compared with placebo (33), and fibre supplementation may also be associated with aggravation of symptoms for some patients with IBS (34).
- Psyllium husks had a significant effect in treating IBS symptoms (13).
- Insoluble fibres such as bran should be limited in IBS as they can exacerbate symptoms such as pain and bloating, and there is no evidence demonstrating efficacy in alleviating symptoms (6,13).
- Prunes and prune fibre have demonstrated efficacy in alleviating constipation, with one meta-analysis demonstrating increased stool frequency and greater improvement in stool consistency compared with the administration of psyllium fibre in patients with IBS-C (35).
- A total fibre intake of 20–30 g/day is recommended (6).
Lactose
While there is plenty of evidence that IBS patients commonly report milk intolerance, there is no conclusive evidence to suggest an objective link between IBS and any known malabsorption syndromes, including lactose malabsorption (36). Due to the similarity of clinical presentations of lactose intolerance and IBS and the high prevalence of both conditions in the general population, a hydrogen breath test should be performed in patients newly diagnosed with IBS to identify those who would be most likely to benefit from a lactose-free diet (36).
Gluten
There is little evidence to support a benefit of a gluten-free diet in IBS (18). However, because wheat contains fructan, a FODMAP, a gluten-free diet incorporates elements of a low FODMAP diet. Therefore, some patients might adapt a low FODMAP diet to one that instead avoids gluten (37).
Two small RCTs of gluten rechallenge among patients whose IBS responded to gluten withdrawal found no statistically significant effect on IBS symptoms between the gluten challenge and the gluten-free diet (38,39). Further larger studies are required.
Polyphenols
Polyphenols, such as green tea polyphenol, curcumin, resveratrol and quercetin, interact with the microbiome, producing various metabolites that influence dysbiosis and gastrointestinal tract (GIT) barrier permeability. These gastro-protective effects of polyphenols may be beneficial in IBS prevention and management (40,41). However, clinical trials are needed to confirm the theoretical benefit of polyphenols in IBS.
Dietary and herbal supplements
The commonly studied dietary and herbal supplements for IBS management are shown in Table 1. There is limited data available for the use of berberine (42), melatonin (43) and Boswellia caterii (44). Traditionally, herbal antispasmodic, laxative, antidiarrheal and anxiolytic formulas are used to treat various IBS symptoms.
Table 1 Commonly studied dietary and herbal supplements
|
|
|
|
200 mg three times daily, enteric-coated anise oil capsule |
|
1 g per day |
|
5 g three times daily in IBS-D following an enteric infection |
|
|
|
Peppermint oil (56,57,58,59) |
|
St John’s wort (62,63,64) |
|
Microbial manipulation
Potential approaches that manipulate intestinal microbes are prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics, and faecal microbial transplant (FMT).
Pre and probiotics
Some probiotics may be beneficial in IBS; however, which combination, strain or species should be preferred in any individual patient remains unclear (65). The quality of evidence is low, with the majority of trials being small and at unclear risk of bias. Overall, it is reasonable to advise patients wishing to try probiotics to take a combination product for up to 12 weeks, but to discontinue treatment if symptoms do not improve (3).
- Probiotics, specifically Bifidobacteria, may improve abdominal pain in patients with IBS; however, RCT results are conflicting and vary based on strain, dosage and delivery method used (66).
- Flortec, a symbiotic containing Lactobacillus paracasei B21060 as well as prebiotics, xylooligosaccharides, glutamine, and arabinogalactan, improved pain and well-being in patients with IBS-D compared with a preparation of the same three prebiotics (67).
- The probiotic longum NCC3001 reduces depression scores, improves quality of life, and alters brain activity by reducing flow in multiple brain areas, including the amygdala and frontolimbic regions that are associated with negative emotional stimuli in patients with IBS (68).
- Co-supplementation with Vitamin D3 and probiotics (L. acidophilus, CUL60, CUL21, B. bifidum CUL20 and B. animalis subsp. lactis CUL34) did not provide benefit to IBS patients (69).
- Gelsectan is a combination prebiotic containing xyloglucan, pea protein and tannins from grape seed extract, and xylooligosaccharides may be beneficial in patients with IBS-D (70).
- The intake of inulin has been linked to the regulation of bowel peristalsis and transit, stool consistency and frequency, therefore making it particularly suitable for patients with IBS-C (71).
There are various pathophysiologic mechanisms of action of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics via multidisciplinary domains in mitigating IBS symptoms. These include (72):
- Gastroenterology (microbiota modulation, alteration of gut barrier function, visceral hypersensitivity, and GI dysmotility)
- Immunology (intestinal immunological modulation)
- Neurology (microbiota-gut-brain axis communication and comorbidities)
Faecal microbial transplant
Studies of the potential effect of FMT in IBS have yielded inconclusive results.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis involving 267 patients showed no significant benefit of FMT whether administered by capsule, colonoscopy, or nasojejunal tube, with FMT almost equivalent to placebo (73).
- There has been considerable interest in the results of a study using stool from a super-donor. The study compared placebo with 30-g and 60-g doses that were delivered via upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (74). While it appears that FMT from the super-donor was beneficial in the treatment of IBS compared with placebo, 75% of the treated patients still had moderate or severe IBS symptom severity after treatment. In addition, around 20% of the patients in the FMT group reported adverse effects of abdominal pain, cramping or tenderness, diarrhoea, or constipation compared with only 2% of patients in the placebo group.
- It is important to recognise the risks of FMT, including the transmission of pathogenic bacteria (75).
Exercise
With respect to GI symptoms, exercise can accelerate GI transit (76), improve intestinal gas clearance in patients with bloating (77) and might increase gut microbial diversity, with the potential to positively impact symptoms via the gut-brain axis (78). It is, therefore, reasonable to assume that exercise will benefit patients with IBS.
Psychological interventions
Cognitive behavioural therapy and gut-directed hypnotherapy are the psychological therapies with the largest evidence base, with evidence of efficacy for up to 12 months follow-up (3,79,80). Other effective therapies include relaxation therapy, multicomponent psychological therapy, and dynamic psychotherapy (81).
Acupuncture
Acupuncture can also be considered as an adjunctive therapy for improvement of IBS symptoms and quality of life (82).